Why this conversation
Explaining a vendor limitation as a fact to route around, and deciding where each test belongs instead of trying to make one chain do everything.
Dialogue
Sun-woo: The 7715 popup never appears on the devnet. Same code works on Sepolia. Something's wrong with our chain.
Jay: Nothing's wrong with the chain. MetaMask gates that popup on a list of chains it supports, and 313370 isn't on it. It wasn't on it as 31337 either.
Sun-woo: Can we get on the list?
Jay: Not for a private devnet. So we stop trying to make one chain do everything. The delegation framework deploys fine on the devnet; I verified that on the fourteenth. The popup is a Sepolia test.
Sun-woo: So the demo has two chains?
Jay: The demo has one path with two adapters. On the devnet the server builds the EIP-712 delegation and the user signs it; on Sepolia MetaMask does it in the popup. Same mandate either way.
Sun-woo: I'll write that in the README so nobody debugs this again.
Jay: Put it next to the chain-id decision. That's where someone will look.
Key expressions
| Expression | 뜻 · 쓰이는 자리 |
|---|---|
| never appears | 절대 나타나지 않는다 |
| nothing's wrong with the chain | 체인에는 문제가 없다 |
| gates it on a list | 목록으로 제한한다 |
| can we get on the list? | 목록에 들어갈 수 있나? |
| make one chain do everything | 한 체인이 모든 걸 하게 하다 |
| deploys fine | 잘 배포된다 |
| one path with two adapters | 어댑터 둘이 달린 경로 하나 |
| same mandate either way | 어느 쪽이든 같은 위임 |
| so nobody debugs this again | 아무도 이걸 다시 디버깅하지 않게 |
| that's where someone will look | 사람들이 찾아볼 곳이 거기다 |